Comparison Overview
NSW Rural Fire Service

NSW Rural Fire Service
4 Murray Rose Ave, Sydney Olympic Park, 2127, AU
Last Update: 29/06/2026
On 1 September 1997, the NSW Rural Fire Service (NSW RFS) was established by an act of Parliament as the successor to the first bush fire brigade, redefining the world's largest fire service and building on a century of experience in protecting some of the most fire-pro...

DEKRA
Handwerkstr. 15, Stuttgart, 70565, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
For 100 years, DEKRA has been a trusted name in safety. Founded in 1925 with the original goal of improving road safety through vehicle inspections, DEKRA has grown to become the world's largest independent, non-listed expert organization in the field of testing, inspec...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NSW Rural Fire Service







DEKRA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
NSW Rural Fire Service has 23.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DEKRA in 2026.
Incident History - NSW Rural Fire Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NSW Rural Fire Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DEKRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DEKRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NSW Rural Fire Service

DEKRA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.