Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) SingaporeNational Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore
VS
ThoughtworksThoughtworks
National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

1 Fusionopolis Way, Singapore, 138632, SG

Last Update: 10/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.nscc.sg
637/1000Poor

NSCC Singapore was established to manage Singapore’s national high performance computing (HPC) resources, a critical asset that drives the advancement of cutting-edge research, technology and innovation. As a National Research Infrastructure funded by the National Resea...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:38
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

200 E Randolph St, 25th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60601-6501

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thoughtworks.com
792/1000Fair

We are a global technology consultancy that delivers extraordinary impact by blending design, engineering and AI expertise. For 30 years, our commitment to design-led thinking, engineering excellence and innovation means we prioritize people, build teams with strong te...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,302
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore has 7.53% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thoughtworks in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thoughtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thoughtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NSCAVI1775824460
🔒 Incident : Breach
NSC1775824076
Thoughtworks

Thoughtworks

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore company and Thoughtworks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore and Thoughtworks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore or Thoughtworks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore or Thoughtworks ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore and Thoughtworks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between National Supercomputing Centre (NSCC) Singapore and Thoughtworks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1