Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)
VS
Army National GuardArmy National Guard
Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

N/A

Last Update: 22/06/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

OUR VISION Deliver dynamic, innovative, and integrated programs and services that inspire Sailors and Navy families to thrive throughout their military life cycle. OUR CORE ATTRIBUTES Service, Respect, Transparency, Accountability, Integrity, Dedication OUR MISSION Fl...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Army National Guard

Army National Guard

111 S George Mason Dr, Arlington, 22204, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.NATIONALGUARD.com
748/1000Moderate

Welcome to the Army National Guard's page on LinkedIn.  The Army National Guard, also known as the National Guard, is one component of The Army (which consists of the Active Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserve). National Guard Soldiers serve both commun...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:58,739
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Army National Guard

Army National Guard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Army National Guard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Army National Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Army National Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Army National Guard

Army National Guard

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ARM711072025

FAQ

Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) company and Army National Guard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) and Army National Guard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) and Army National Guard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) or Army National Guard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) or Army National Guard ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) and Army National Guard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Navy Region Europe, Africa, Central Fleet and Family Readiness (FFR) and Army National Guard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2