Comparison Overview
Novartis México

Novartis México
Insurgentes Sur 2475, Ciudad de Mexico, 01090 , MX
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Novartis Farmacéutica, S.A. de C.V. es individualmente “Responsable” de recabar sus datos personales, con domicilio en Av. Insurgentes Sur 2475, Tizapán San Ángel, Álvaro Obregón, 01090 Ciudad de México. Los datos personales que usted nos proporcione serán utilizados pa...

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
Glenmark House, B.D.Sawant Marg,, Chakala, Andheri (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400099
Last Update: 12/09/2026
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited is a research-led, global organization committed to enriching lives. Innovation is deeply embedded in Glenmark’s culture; it is how we differentiate ourselves in our key markets and create greater value for our stakeholders. In our jou...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Novartis México







Glenmark Pharmaceuticals






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Novartis México in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Novartis México (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Novartis México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Glenmark Pharmaceuticals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Novartis México

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.