Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NovartisNovartis
VS
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Novartis

Novartis

Novartis Campus, Basel, 4002, CH

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.novartis.com
810/1000Good

Novartis is an innovative medicines company. Every day, working to reimagine medicine to improve and extend people’s lives so that patients, healthcare professionals and societies are empowered in the face of serious disease. Our medicines reach more than 250 million pe...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:86,785
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

304, Atlanta Arcade Marol Church Road, Mumbai, 400059, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

A vertically integrated, Global Pharmaceutical Company. Established in 1989, we are engaged in developing, manufacturing, and marketing a wide range of formulations across several major therapeutic areas including anti-infectives, cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, dermato...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:11,821
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Novartis

Novartis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Novartis has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Novartis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novartis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Novartis

Novartis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOV1774449180
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOV21267722
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Novartis company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Novartis and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Novartis and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Novartis or MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Novartis or MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ?
Between Novartis and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Novartis and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA