Comparison Overview
Novartis Sverige

Novartis Sverige
Torshamnsgatan 48, Kista, Stockholm, 164 40, SE
Last Update: 14/12/2025
Novartis arbetar för att skapa mervärde för patienter och våra samarbetspartners inom sjukvården. Vi vill påverka människors liv i en positiv riktning genom att upptäcka, utveckla och marknadsföra nya produkter för att bota sjukdomar och förbättra människors livskvalite...

Ipca Laboratories Limited
125 Kandivli Industrial Estate, Kandivli (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400067
Last Update: 13/09/2026
A consumer-led global pharmaceutical company, creating healthy doses of life since 1949. When you operate in an industry like pharmaceuticals, your work goes way beyond creating ‘products for customers’. It is different from any other domain – there lies a higher sense...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Novartis Sverige







Ipca Laboratories Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Novartis Sverige in 2026.
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ipca Laboratories Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Novartis Sverige (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Novartis Sverige cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ipca Laboratories Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ipca Laboratories Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Novartis Sverige

Ipca Laboratories Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.