Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Novabev GroupNovabev Group
VS
Southern Glazer's Wine & SpiritsSouthern Glazer's Wine & Spirits
Novabev Group

Novabev Group

4, Yakimanskaya emb., Moscow, 117845, RU

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://novabev.com/
663/1000Weak

Novabev Group is one of the largest producers, distributors and importers of alcohol in Russia. The company employs over 14,000 talented people. The head office is based in Moscow. The group runs five factories, ethanol plant, winery and manages its own distribution sy...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:236
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 33169

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Southern Glazer’s Wine & Spirits is the world’s pre-eminent distributor of beverage alcohol, and proud to be a multi-generational, family-owned company. We have operations in 47 states and Canada. We offer an array of careers focused on delivering a captivating and rewa...

NAICS:3121
NAICS Definition:Beverage Manufacturing
Employees:16,829
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Novabev Group

Novabev Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Novabev Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Novabev Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novabev Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Novabev Group

Novabev Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOV4602046100325
Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Novabev Group company and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Novabev Group and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Novabev Group and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Novabev Group or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Novabev Group or Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits ?
Between Novabev Group and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Novabev Group and Southern Glazer's Wine & Spirits, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA