Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NOVA by Saint-GobainNOVA by Saint-Gobain
VS
VirginVirgin
NOVA by Saint-Gobain

NOVA by Saint-Gobain

Paris, FR

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

NOVA by Saint-Gobain is the specialized branch for partnerships and venture capital investments. Our primary objective is to foster innovation by collaborating with startups worldwide. We establish co-development partnerships, distribution, marketing, or licensing agre...

NAICS:52391
NAICS Definition:Miscellaneous Intermediation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:103
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Virgin

Virgin

Whitfield Studios, London, W1T2NS, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.virgin.com
784/1000Fair

At Virgin, we’re all about creating unique customer experiences, challenging the status quo and championing people and the planet. For five decades, in five business sectors and on five continents, our purpose is to change business for good. The home of Virgin is Vir...

NAICS:52391
NAICS Definition:Miscellaneous Intermediation
Employees:36,685
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NOVA by Saint-Gobain

NOVA by Saint-Gobain

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Virgin

Virgin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NOVA by Saint-Gobain in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virgin in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NOVA by Saint-Gobain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NOVA by Saint-Gobain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Virgin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virgin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NOVA by Saint-Gobain

NOVA by Saint-Gobain

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Virgin

Virgin

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain company and Virgin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain and Virgin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain and Virgin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NOVA by Saint-Gobain or Virgin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NOVA by Saint-Gobain or Virgin ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain and Virgin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NOVA by Saint-Gobain and Virgin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9