NortonLifeLock A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
NortonLifeLock
Company Information
Website:https://www.gendigital.com/us/en/
Employees number:688
Number of followers:34,743
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:gendigital.com
NortonLifeLock Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
NortonLifeLockComputer and Network Security
Updated:
16/09/2026
16/09/2026
668/1000
Weak
B
NortonLifeLock Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
NortonLifeLockComputer and Network Security
Score locked

NortonLifeLockWeak
Current Score
668B (WEAK)
01000
6 incidents
-13 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
OCTOBER 2026
669
SEPTEMBER 2026
689
Cyber Attack
15 Sep 2026 • NortonLifeLock
Telegram, Norton Antivirus, Siemens and U.S. Water Utilities: Iranian spies hit Windows machines with Chosen Brick data-stealing malware
Iranian State-Backed Hackers Deploy Surveillance Malware via Social Messaging Apps
668
CRITICAL-21
SIETELNORNAT1789568886
Iranian State-Backed Hackers Deploy Surveillance Malware via Social Messaging Apps
Western intelligence agencies including the FBI, the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), and the Netherlands’ AIVD have issued a joint warning about Iranian state-sponsored cyber actors targeting individuals with Chosen Brick, a Windows-based malware designed for surveillance and data theft.
Active since at least 2025, the campaign primarily focuses on dissidents, activists, and journalists perceived as threats to the Iranian regime. In some cases, intelligence services have reportedly plotted kidnappings or lethal operations against targeted individuals abroad.
### Attack Methodology
The operation begins with social engineering via WhatsApp and Telegram, where attackers impersonate trusted contacts or organizations. Extensive reconnaissance ensures messages appear credible, leveraging detailed knowledge of the victim’s network and affiliations.
Once rapport is established, victims are tricked into downloading malicious files disguised as legitimate applications, including:
- Pictory
- RunwayML
- Norton Antivirus
- Telegram
- Adobe Flash Player
- KeePass
Upon execution, Chosen Brick silently infects the system, persisting through reboots by modifying the Windows registry (`HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run`). It evades detection by adding exclusions to Microsoft Defender and uses Telegram bots for command-and-control (C2) communications.
### Malware Capabilities
- Data theft: Contacts, emails, and social media messages (WhatsApp/Telegram via browsers).
- Surveillance: Screen and audio capture, system enumeration.
- Persistence: Downloads additional payloads and maintains access.
- Destruction: Can wipe the infected system.
While lateral movement across networks hasn’t been observed, agencies note it remains technically feasible.
### Broader Context
The alert follows a surge in critical infrastructure attacks linked to Iran, including:
- July 2024: Cyberattacks on 100+ U.S. water utilities across 12 states (CISA did not formally attribute the incidents).
- August 2024: A suspected Iran-linked attack shut down a UK power plant.
- AI-driven exploits: U.S. agencies warned of attackers using AI-generated scripts to target Siemens S7 PLCs in water, energy, and manufacturing sectors.
The advisory underscores Iran’s use of cyber operations to suppress dissent and disrupt critical services, with personal and corporate devices both at risk.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
AUGUST 2026
693
Vulnerability
30 Aug 2026 • NortonLifeLock
Avast, GenDigital, AVG and Norton: Chaotic Eclipse Claims Avast Antivirus 0-Day Vulnerability – PoC Released
Zero-Day Privilege-Escalation Flaw in Avast Antivirus Exposed via Public PoC
688
CRITICAL-5
AVGGENNORAVA1788452879
Zero-Day Privilege-Escalation Flaw in Avast Antivirus Exposed via Public PoC
Security researcher Chaotic Eclipse (GitHub handle: MSNightmare) has released a public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit, dubbed PrettyPrague, for a zero-day privilege-escalation vulnerability in Avast Antivirus. The flaw affects fully patched Avast installations on Windows 11 25H2 systems, allowing attackers to bypass security controls via the Avast Sandbox a component designed to isolate suspicious files.
The exploit targets the Windows Security Account Manager (SAM) database, enabling attackers with existing code execution on a system to escalate privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM the highest local security context in Windows. From there, adversaries could access protected credentials, disable security tools, install persistent malware, or modify critical OS settings.
The PoC, published on GitHub, includes C/C++ source files, compiled x64 binaries, and a library (offreg.lib) to dump the SAM database and spawn a SYSTEM-level command shell. While the repository claims compatibility with all Avast versions, this assertion remains unverified, as neither GenDigital (Avast’s parent company) nor a CVE identifier has confirmed the flaw. The researcher also speculated without evidence that other GenDigital products, such as AVG and Norton, may be affected.
The repository was last updated on August 30, 2026, and its public availability raises concerns about potential misuse by threat actors. Security teams are advised to monitor GenDigital advisories, review endpoint telemetry for unusual activity (e.g., Avast services spawning privileged processes or unauthorized SAM access), and implement detection rules for suspicious execution chains involving antivirus sandbox components.
As of now, no patch or official vendor response has been issued, leaving the report as an unverified but high-risk local privilege-escalation claim.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2026
691
JUNE 2026
690
MAY 2026
688
APRIL 2026
686
MARCH 2026
686
FEBRUARY 2026
684
JANUARY 2026
683
DECEMBER 2025
681
NOVEMBER 2025
679
JANUARY 2025
679
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2025 • NortonLifeLock
Pictory, RunwayML and Norton Antivirus: CHOSEN BRICK Malware Lets Iranian State Hackers Steal Emails, WhatsApp and Telegram Data
Iranian State-Linked Hackers Deploy CHOSEN BRICK Malware to Spy on Dissidents
658
CRITICAL-21
PICRUNNOR1789547253
Iranian State-Linked Hackers Deploy CHOSEN BRICK Malware to Spy on Dissidents
A joint advisory from the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), the FBI, and the Netherlands’ AIVD intelligence service has exposed a sustained cyberespionage campaign by Iranian state-linked hackers targeting dissidents, activists, journalists, and perceived regime critics. The operation, active since at least 2025, leverages a Windows malware family called CHOSEN BRICK to infiltrate systems and exfiltrate sensitive data.
The malware has been deployed against individuals in the UK, United States, Netherlands, and other countries, with attackers using social engineering tactics to gain access. Initial contact occurs via WhatsApp, Telegram, and other messaging platforms, where threat actors pose as trusted contacts or technical support personnel. Victims are tricked into downloading malicious files disguised as legitimate applications such as Pictory, RunwayML, Norton Antivirus, Telegram, Adobe Flash Player, or KeePass or as medical documents, including MRI scan results.
Once executed, the malware displays a decoy interface while silently installing CHOSEN BRICK in the background. It establishes persistence by modifying the Windows Registry Run key and evades detection by adding Microsoft Defender exclusions. Command-and-control communications are routed through unique Telegram bot IDs, blending malicious traffic with legitimate Telegram API calls. The malware can also use HTTPS or SOCKS5 proxies to obscure its activity.
CHOSEN BRICK is capable of extensive surveillance, including:
- Stealing emails, social media messages, and contacts
- Capturing screenshots and audio recordings
- Harvesting Telegram and WhatsApp web data
- Enumerating running processes and system details
- Downloading additional malware
- Deleting or wiping compromised systems
Exfiltrated data is transmitted via Telegram bots and cloud-storage services, including VultrObjects, StorjShare, Backblaze B2, and proxy providers like IPRoyal and LightningProxies. Investigators are advised to monitor connections to these domains and scrutinize unexpected Run-key entries or unusual messaging-platform traffic.
The campaign aligns with Iran’s broader strategy of using cyber operations to monitor, intimidate, and harass critics abroad. In past incidents, stolen personal data has been leaked on pro-Iranian websites, amplifying risks to victims’ privacy and safety. The advisory underscores the persistent threat posed by state-sponsored actors exploiting digital platforms for targeted espionage.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2023
696
Data Leak
01 Jan 2023 • NortonLifeLock
NortonLifeLock
Norton Password Manager Accounts Compromised by Credential-Stuffing Attacks
632
CRITICAL-64
NOR225881023
Gen Digital, previously Symantec Corporation, and NortonLifeLock, alerted its clients to the fact that threat actors had compromised Norton Password Manager accounts through credential-stuffing assaults.
The company stated that while none of its systems had been penetrated, the attack may have utilized credentials that came from another source. NortonLifeLock has not yet made public how many customers are affected.
Threat actors could have accessed Password Manager accounts and seen information such as first and last names, phone numbers, and mailing addresses.
NortonLifeLock has announced the adoption of additional security measures for the affected accounts and reset Norton passwords on those accounts in response to the incident.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
DECEMBER 2022
759
Breach
01 Dec 2022 • NortonLifeLock
NortonLifeLock Inc.
NortonLifeLock Gen Digital Data Breach
695
CRITICAL-64
NOR153072525
The Vermont Office of the Attorney General reported on January 9, 2023, that NortonLifeLock Gen Digital experienced a data breach, where unauthorized third parties likely accessed customer usernames and passwords for accounts created before December 1, 2022. The breach began around December 1, 2022, and potentially exposed customer first names, last names, phone numbers, and mailing addresses. The number of affected individuals is currently unknown.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2018
756
Vulnerability
01 Jul 2018 • NortonLifeLock
NortonLifeLock
LifeLock Vulnerability Exposes Customer Emails and Communication Preferences
752
MEDIUM-4
NOR013101122
Identity theft protection firm LifeLock have exposed customers to additional attacks from ID thieves and phishers.
The company just fixed a vulnerability on its site that allowed anyone with a Web browser to index email addresses associated with millions of customer accounts, or to unsubscribe users from all communications from the company.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for NortonLifeLock ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on NortonLifeLock's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with NortonLifeLock ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view NortonLifeLock's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?