Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Northstar Fire Protection of TexasNorthstar Fire Protection of Texas
VS
Tata ProjectsTata Projects
Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

4616 W. Howard Lane, Austin, Texas, 78728, US

Last Update: 28/11/2025

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Headquartered in Austin, Northstar Fire Protection of Texas, Inc. has been on the fore-front of the fire protection industry since 1980. With offices in Austin, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Atlanta, Northstar Fire Protection of Texas, Inc. has grown to be a natio...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:101
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tataprojects.com
809/1000Good

Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:19,310
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Northstar Fire Protection of Texas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Northstar Fire Protection of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Northstar Fire Protection of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

Northstar Fire Protection of Texas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Projects

Tata Projects

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas company and Tata Projects company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas and Tata Projects, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas and Tata Projects, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Northstar Fire Protection of Texas or Tata Projects ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Northstar Fire Protection of Texas or Tata Projects ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas and Tata Projects, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Northstar Fire Protection of Texas and Tata Projects, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA