Comparison Overview
Northeastern University

Northeastern University
360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, US, 02115-5005
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Founded in 1898, Northeastern is a global research university with a distinctive, experience-driven approach to education and discovery. The university is a leader in experiential learning, powered by the world’s most far-reaching cooperative education program. We inte...

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Avda. Libertador Bernardo OHiggins 340, Santiago, 8320000, CL
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Founded in 1888, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile is currently one of the leading higher education institutions in Latin America. Approximately 22,000 students are enrolled in graduate and undergraduate programs, which encompass a wide range of disciplines an...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Northeastern University







Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Northeastern University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in 2026.
Incident History - Northeastern University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Northeastern University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Northeastern University

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.