Comparison Overview
Northeastern University Information Technology Services
Northeastern University Information Technology Services
Boston, 02115, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Information Technology Services (ITS) is helping to shape and execute Northeastern University’s bold vision for transforming the way students, faculty, staff, alumni, and employers learn, teach, research, and collaborate. ITS is also the central provider of technology ...
Algar Tech
Avenida Floriano Peixoto, Uberlândia, 38405-184, BR
Last Update: 02/10/2026
Somos a Algar Tech CX. Com 26 anos de mercado, atuamos como parceira de negócio para a transformação digital de grandes corporações. Nosso portfólio possui serviços de Relacionamento com o Cliente, que visam melhorar a experiência dos consumidores. Somos mais de 7 mil a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Northeastern University Information Technology Services
Algar Tech
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Northeastern University Information Technology Services in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Algar Tech in 2026.
Incident History - Northeastern University Information Technology Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Northeastern University Information Technology Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Algar Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Algar Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Northeastern University Information Technology Services
Algar Tech
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.