Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

North Star ImagingNorth Star Imaging
VS
Johnson ControlsJohnson Controls
North Star Imaging

North Star Imaging

19875 S. Diamond Lake Road, Rogers, MN, 55374, US

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.4nsi.com
745/1000Moderate

North Star Imaging ranks among the most sophisticated resources for digital real-time non-destructive testing (NDT) equipment, services, training, supplies and accessories. Highly-trained, innovative engineers design and build the complete line and custom state-of-the-a...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:60,211
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
North Star Imaging

North Star Imaging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Star Imaging in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - North Star Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Star Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
North Star Imaging

North Star Imaging

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
JOH4502045100625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
JOH174511023

FAQ

Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between North Star Imaging company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between North Star Imaging and Johnson Controls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between North Star Imaging and Johnson Controls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - North Star Imaging or Johnson Controls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - North Star Imaging or Johnson Controls ?
Between North Star Imaging and Johnson Controls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between North Star Imaging and Johnson Controls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA