Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

North American Rescue, LLCNorth American Rescue, LLC
VS
Olympus CorporationOlympus Corporation
North American Rescue, LLC

North American Rescue, LLC

35 Tedwall Ct., None, Greer, SC, US, 29650

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.NARescue.com
603/1000Poor

North American Rescue (NAR), based in Greer, South Carolina, has proudly enjoyed the honor of serving their country, community, and customers for over two decades. NAR is leading the way in decreasing preventable deaths by providing innovative casualty care solutions to...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:157
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Olympus Corporation

Olympus Corporation

Nishi-shinjuku 2-3-1 Shinjuku Monolith, Shinjuku-ku, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Olympus is passionate about creating customer-driven solutions for the medical industry. For more than 100 years, Olympus has focused on making people’s lives healthier, safer and more fulfilling by helping detect, prevent, and treat disease, furthering scientific resea...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:13,565
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
North American Rescue, LLC

North American Rescue, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Olympus Corporation

Olympus Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North American Rescue, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Olympus Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - North American Rescue, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North American Rescue, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Olympus Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Olympus Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
North American Rescue, LLC

North American Rescue, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR548091725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOR335072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOR857080425
Olympus Corporation

Olympus Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC company and Olympus Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC and Olympus Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC and Olympus Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - North American Rescue, LLC or Olympus Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - North American Rescue, LLC or Olympus Corporation ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC and Olympus Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between North American Rescue, LLC and Olympus Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2