Comparison Overview
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
None, None, Portsmouth, VA, US, 23709
Last Update: 19/03/2026
"We are America's Shipyard" We are Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY), continuously driving to excellence and delivering service to the fleet safely with the right quality on schedule and within budget. NNSY is recognized as a world class organization in executing our missi...
Lockheed Martin
6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 20817, US
Last Update: 20/05/2026
The world relies on what we do. Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, with offices across the U.S. and around the globe, our team delivers solutions that strengthen national security, shape industries and push engineering and technology to new levels. We collaborate t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
Lockheed Martin
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Norfolk Naval Shipyard in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Lockheed Martin has 85.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Norfolk Naval Shipyard (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Norfolk Naval Shipyard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lockheed Martin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lockheed Martin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Norfolk Naval Shipyard
Lockheed Martin
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.