Comparison Overview
Nordea

Nordea
Aleksanterinkatu 36 B, Helsinki, FI
Last Update: 29/03/2026
We are a universal bank with a 200-year history of supporting and growing the Nordic economies – enabling dreams and aspirations for a greater good. Every day, we work to support our customers’ financial development, delivering best-in-class omnichannel customer experie...

Emirates NBD
Baniyas Road, Opp Dubai Creek Tower, Deira, Dubai, AE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
About Emirates NBD Emirates NBD (DFM: Emirates NBD) is a leading banking group in the MENAT (Middle East, North Africa and Türkiye) region with a presence in 13 countries, serving over 20 million customers. As at 30th September 2023, total assets were AED 836 billion,...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nordea







Emirates NBD






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nordea in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
Emirates NBD has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Nordea (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nordea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Emirates NBD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Emirates NBD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nordea

Emirates NBD
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.