Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Non-Sterile Topicals and LiquidsNon-Sterile Topicals and Liquids
VS
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.
Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

N/A

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jublHS.com
754/1000Fair

Jubilant HollisterStier Contract Manufacturing & Services is dedicated to providing your non-sterile topical or liquid product safely and efficiently to market. Visit our website for more information.

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

304, Atlanta Arcade Marol Church Road, Mumbai, 400059, IN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

A vertically integrated, Global Pharmaceutical Company. Established in 1989, we are engaged in developing, manufacturing, and marketing a wide range of formulations across several major therapeutic areas including anti-infectives, cardiovascular, anti-diabetic, dermato...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:11,821
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids company and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids or MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids or MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Non-Sterile Topicals and Liquids and MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1