Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Non Destructive Testing Services LtdNon Destructive Testing Services Ltd
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

Woodland Lodge, Nottingham, NG13 9PL, GB

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

NDT Services Ltd based in Nottingham UK have a wealth of experience specialising in pile integrity testing, static pile maintained load testing and dynamic load testing nationwide. Founded in 1990, we have worked closely with many of the UK's leading piling companies...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
758/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:11,329
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd or Kier Group ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Non Destructive Testing Services Ltd and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3