Comparison Overview
Nomensa

Nomensa
King William House, Bristol, undefined, BS1 4NT, GB
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Nomensa is a strategic UX design agency transforming digital experiences. Our unique approach draws on our extensive experience in psychology, interaction design and technology. We drive commercial value for our clients creating experiences that engage and delight th...

Peraton
1875 Explorer St, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Peraton, we're at the forefront of delivering the next big thing every day. We're the partner of choice to help solve some of the world's most daunting challenges, delivering bold, new solutions to keep people around the world safer and more secure. How do we do it?...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nomensa







Peraton






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nomensa in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Peraton in 2026.
Incident History - Nomensa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nomensa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Peraton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Peraton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nomensa

Peraton
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.