Comparison Overview
Nokia audio technologies

Nokia audio technologies
Karakaari 7, Espoo, 02610, FI
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Nokia audio technologies brings over 30 years of innovation to the next era of audio communication—advancing immersive audio, spatial audio communication, and industry standards such as MPEG-I immersive audio and the 3GPP IVAS codec. We lead the development and standa...

Free
16, Rue de la Ville-l'Évêque, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75008
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Trublion historique des Télécoms, Free reste un opérateur pas comme les autres. Nous continuons de nous distinguer de nos concurrents par nos produits, par notre politique tarifaire ou encore par le ton employé avec nos abonnés. Cette différence a aussi construit la gr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nokia audio technologies







Free






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nokia audio technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Free in 2026.
Incident History - Nokia audio technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nokia audio technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Free (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Free cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nokia audio technologies

Free
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.
Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.