Comparison Overview
NoA Ignite

NoA Ignite
Tulegatan 13, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE, 11353
Last Update: 10/02/2026
NoA Ignite is a unified tech partner built by pioneers from specialist agencies App Shack, Axenon, DK&A, and the original NoA Ignite (Oakwood and Making Waves). With more than 400 experts across five countries, we help ambitious companies shape a future of experience-le...

Prosus
Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS
Last Update: 29/06/2026
Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geogra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NoA Ignite







Prosus






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NoA Ignite in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2026.
Incident History - NoA Ignite (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NoA Ignite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NoA Ignite

Prosus
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.