Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NMBS–SNCB ImmoNMBS–SNCB Immo
VS
Keller Williams Realty, LLCKeller Williams Realty, LLC
NMBS–SNCB Immo

NMBS–SNCB Immo

Frankrijkstraat, None, Anderlecht, Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, BE, 1070

Last Update: 09/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nmbs.be/immo
756/1000Fair

L’offre immobilière de la SNCB

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, Austin, TX, US, 78746

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://headquarters.kw.com/
800/1000Good

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the world’s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-c...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:102,888
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NMBS–SNCB Immo

NMBS–SNCB Immo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NMBS–SNCB Immo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NMBS–SNCB Immo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NMBS–SNCB Immo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NMBS–SNCB Immo

NMBS–SNCB Immo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEL020091825

FAQ

Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NMBS–SNCB Immo or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NMBS–SNCB Immo or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NMBS–SNCB Immo and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8