Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und VerkehrNiedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr
VS
Larsen & ToubroLarsen & Toubro
Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

Göttinger Chaussee 76A, Hannover, 30453 , DE

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Als Landesbehörde planen, bauen, betreiben und unterhalten wir landesweit die Bundes- und Landesstraßen, zahlreiche Brücken und Tunnel, einen Teil der Kreisstraßen und ein ausgedehntes Radwegenetz in Niedersachsen. Mit rund 2.900 Mitarbeitenden sorgen wir täglich in uns...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:162
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

N.M.Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400001

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

Larsen & Toubro is an Indian multinational engaged in EPC Projects, Hi-Tech Manufacturing and Services. It operates in over 50 countries worldwide. A strong, customer-focused approach and the constant quest for top-class quality have enabled L&T to attain and sustain ...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:135,733
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larsen & Toubro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Larsen & Toubro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larsen & Toubro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr or Larsen & Toubro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr or Larsen & Toubro ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Niedersächsische Landesbehörde für Straßenbau und Verkehr and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16197
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is the function handleMessageReceive of the file pkg/channels/feishu/feishu_64.go of the component Group Message Handler. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16196
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Impacted is the function isPrivateOrRestrictedIP of the file pkg/tools/integration/web.go of the component web_fetch. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Patch name: 2efbe5d560e7ed9bc5209c203dc4aa6ecdbc7405. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16195
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This issue affects the function dispatchIncoming of the file pkg/channels/wecom/wecom.go of the component Group Message Handler. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-10130
SUMMARY

QueryWeaver contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid session tokens for existing accounts by submitting a signup request with a known victim email address. The signup route unconditionally creates and links a new token to the matching Identity via a Cypher MERGE operation before checking whether the email belongs to an existing account, causing the server to return a valid authenticated session token for the victim's identity without requiring any prior credentials or user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-16194
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This affects the function WebFetch.execute of the file agent/tools/web_fetch/web_fetch.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is able to mitigate this issue. This patch is called ea47f3097eed4f8295c4cb3d76ecb97e0f43d632. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8