Comparison Overview
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, US, 20899
Last Update: 04/04/2026
We are the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce. For more than a century, NIST has helped to keep U.S. technology at the leading edge. Our measurements support the smallest of techn...
Utrecht University
Heidelberglaan 6, Utrecht, Utrecht, 3512, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Utrecht University (UU), we are working towards a better world. We do this by researching complex issues beyond the borders of disciplines. We put thinkers in contact with doers, so new insights can be applied. We give students the space to develop themselves. In so ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Utrecht University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Utrecht University in 2026.
Incident History - National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Utrecht University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Utrecht University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Utrecht University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.