Comparison Overview

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

VS

Chinese Academy of Sciences

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, US, 20899
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nist.gov

We are the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce. For more than a century, NIST has helped to keep U.S. technology at the leading edge. Our measurements support the smallest of technologies to the largest and most complex of human-made creations. NIST's mission is to promote U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life. See what innovative work we’re doing to support it: https://www.nist.gov/

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 4,906
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Chinese Academy of Sciences

52 Sanlihe Rd., Beijing, CN, 100864
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://english.cas.cn/

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is the lead national scientific institution in natural sciences and high technology development in China and the country's supreme scientific advisory body. It incorporates three major parts: a comprehensive research and development network consisting of 104 research institutes, a traditional merit-based national academy as represented by its Academic Divisions and a system of higher education based on its affiliated 3 universities and the support of its research institutes. CAS has served as the major national strategic research force since founding in November 1949 and has left its deep footprints in Chinese S&T and the overall development of China's national innovation system.

NAICS: 5417
NAICS Definition: Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees: 14,863
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nist.jpeg
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
Chinese Academy of Sciences
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chinese Academy of Sciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2026.

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2026.

Incident History — National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chinese Academy of Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinese Academy of Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nist.jpeg
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Deprioritizing AI safety in favor of AI opportunity
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing, Malicious intrusions
Motivation: Cyberespionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Chinese Academy of Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Chinese Academy of Sciences have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Chinese Academy of Sciences company and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chinese Academy of Sciences company nor National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Chinese Academy of Sciences company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Chinese Academy of Sciences company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company nor Chinese Academy of Sciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Chinese Academy of Sciences company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company.

Chinese Academy of Sciences company employs more people globally than National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) company, reflecting its scale as a Research Services.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) nor Chinese Academy of Sciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References