Comparison Overview

Nissan Motor Corporation

VS

Volvo Group

Nissan Motor Corporation

1-1, Takashima 1-chome,, None, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP, 220-8686
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.nissan-global.com

Nissan Motor Corporation is a global car manufacturer that sells a full line of vehicles under the Nissan and INFINITI brands. Nissan’s global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan, manages operations in four regions: Japan-ASEAN, China, Americas, and AMIEO (Africa, Middle East, India, Europe & Oceania). For more information about our products, services and commitment to sustainable mobility, visit nissan-global.com. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and see all our latest videos on YouTube.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 45,615
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Volvo Group

Gropegårdsgatan 2, Göteborg, SE, 417 15
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549
https://www.volvogroup.com

The Volvo Group is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of trucks, buses, construction equipment and marine and industrial engines. The Group also provides complete solutions for financing and service. The Volvo Group, with its headquarters in Gothenburg, employs about 100,000 people, has production facilities in 18 countries and sells its products in more than 190 markets.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 77,329
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nissan Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Volvo Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nissan Motor Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Volvo Group has 400.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Nissan Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nissan Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Volvo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvo-group.jpeg
Volvo Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: third-party vendor compromise
Motivation: financial (presumed, based on ransomware attack)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Nissan Motor Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Volvo Group company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Nissan Motor Corporation company.

In the current year, Volvo Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Nissan Motor Corporation company.

Volvo Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Nissan Motor Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Volvo Group company and Nissan Motor Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Volvo Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation company nor Volvo Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Volvo Group company.

Volvo Group company employs more people globally than Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Volvo Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References