Comparison Overview

Nissan Motor Corporation

VS

Hyundai Motor Company

Nissan Motor Corporation

1-1, Takashima 1-chome,, None, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP, 220-8686
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.nissan-global.com

Nissan Motor Corporation is a global car manufacturer that sells a full line of vehicles under the Nissan and INFINITI brands. Nissan’s global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan, manages operations in four regions: Japan-ASEAN, China, Americas, and AMIEO (Africa, Middle East, India, Europe & Oceania). For more information about our products, services and commitment to sustainable mobility, visit nissan-global.com. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and see all our latest videos on YouTube.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 45,615
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Hyundai Motor Company

231, Yangjae-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, KR, 137-938
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://worldwide.hyundai.com

Our mission is clear: to become a lifelong mobility partner for our customers and communities by creating meaningful progress through clean energy, connected technology, and human-centered innovation. Hyundai Motor Company is a global mobility leader committed to shaping a better future. With more than 120,000 employees across 200+ countries, we are redefining the way the world moves, not just through innovation in automotive design, but through bold investments in smart mobility, sustainability, and technology. Each year, we bring over 4.6 million vehicles to drivers around the globe – from award-winning sedans to cutting-edge electric and hydrogen-powered solutions.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 58,518
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyundai-motor-company.jpeg
Hyundai Motor Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nissan Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hyundai Motor Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nissan Motor Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyundai Motor Company in 2025.

Incident History — Nissan Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nissan Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hyundai Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyundai Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyundai-motor-company.jpeg
Hyundai Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hyundai Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Hyundai Motor Company company.

In the current year, Hyundai Motor Company company and Nissan Motor Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hyundai Motor Company company nor Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Hyundai Motor Company company and Nissan Motor Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Hyundai Motor Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation company nor Hyundai Motor Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hyundai Motor Company company.

Hyundai Motor Company company employs more people globally than Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor Hyundai Motor Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References