Comparison Overview

Nissan Motor Corporation

VS

DENSO

Nissan Motor Corporation

1-1, Takashima 1-chome,, None, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP, 220-8686
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

Nissan Motor Corporation is a global car manufacturer that sells a full line of vehicles under the Nissan and INFINITI brands. Nissan’s global headquarters in Yokohama, Japan, manages operations in four regions: Japan-ASEAN, China, Americas, and AMIEO (Africa, Middle East, India, Europe & Oceania). For more information about our products, services and commitment to sustainable mobility, visit nissan-global.com. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and see all our latest videos on YouTube.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 45,615
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

DENSO

24777 Denso Dr, Southfield, Michigan, US, 48033
Last Update: 2025-12-09

DENSO is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers with a 75-year history of providing advanced automotive systems and technology to automakers worldwide. While our products are featured on nearly every vehicle make and model on the road today, we're also looking to innovate beyond automotive so we can maximize how we support the evolving needs of society. Globally, we have 158,000 employees, including 27,000+ in North America, working together every day to pursue our Two Great Causes: Green -- which represents our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2035 through our products, processes and facilities; and Peace of Mind -- which focuses on developing solutions for safer and more seamless experiences across society. Together, they help us pursue our mission of contributing to a better world.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,533
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nissan Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DENSO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nissan Motor Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DENSO in 2025.

Incident History — Nissan Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nissan Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DENSO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DENSO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nissan-motor-corporation.jpeg
Nissan Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denso.jpeg
DENSO
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

FAQ

DENSO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nissan Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to DENSO company.

In the current year, DENSO company and Nissan Motor Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DENSO company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Nissan Motor Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other DENSO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while DENSO company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation company nor DENSO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nissan Motor Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DENSO company.

Nissan Motor Corporation company employs more people globally than DENSO company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nissan Motor Corporation nor DENSO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N