Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nisga'a Tek, LLCNisga'a Tek, LLC
VS
CGICGI
Nisga'a Tek, LLC

Nisga'a Tek, LLC

14900 Bogle Dr, Chantilly, Virginia, 20151, US

Last Update: 26/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nisgaatek.com
751/1000Fair

Nisga’a Tek is honored to provide services to those who are committed to our national defense, security, and mission. With Nisga’a Tek, your mission is possible, every step of the way – from cybersecurity to mission support to comprehensive intelligence support service...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CGI

CGI

Worldwide, Worldwide, CA, 00

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://cgi.com
739/1000Moderate

Insights you can act on. Founded in 1976, CGI is among the largest IT and business consulting services firms in the world. We are insights-driven and outcomes-focused to help accelerate returns on your investments. Across hundreds of locations worldwide, we provide com...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:70,253
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nisga'a Tek, LLC

Nisga'a Tek, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CGI

CGI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nisga'a Tek, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

CGI has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Nisga'a Tek, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nisga'a Tek, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CGI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nisga'a Tek, LLC

Nisga'a Tek, LLC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CGI

CGI

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CGI1773398582

FAQ

Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC company and CGI company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC and CGI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC and CGI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nisga'a Tek, LLC or CGI ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nisga'a Tek, LLC or CGI ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC and CGI, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nisga'a Tek, LLC and CGI, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA