Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nippon Paint Czech Republic | AutomotiveNippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive
VS
AkzoNobelAkzoNobel
Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

Průmyslová zóna Ovčáry 296, Kolín, undefined, 28002, CZ

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nipponpaint.cz/
754/1000Fair

Nippon Paint Automotive Coatings Czech (NPACZ) je nový, moderní přírůstek do rodiny Nippon Paint, jejíž historie sahá až do roku 1881. Lokace firmy v Kolíně na Průmyslové zóně je strategická z několika ohledů – je možné využít know how chemického průmyslu, důležitá je b...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.akzonobel.com
318/1000Critical

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:31,151
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AkzoNobel has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772649747
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772583818

FAQ

Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive or AkzoNobel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive or AkzoNobel ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive and AkzoNobel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nippon Paint Czech Republic | Automotive and AkzoNobel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1