Comparison Overview
Nile Sugar

Nile Sugar
162B 26th of July Street, Cairo, EG
Last Update: 14/02/2026
• Nile Sugar was established in 2006 by the Sawiris family with investment of EGP 2,5 billion and started production and operations in 2010. • NSC operates and manages a world class beet sugar extraction plant and refinery producing white sugar and i...

ADM
77 W Wacker Dr, Chicago, 60601, US
Last Update: 29/03/2026
ADM unlocks the power of nature to enrich the quality of life. We’re an essential global agricultural supply chain manager and processor, providing food security by connecting local needs with global capabilities. We’re a premier human and animal nutrition provider, off...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nile Sugar







ADM






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nile Sugar in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ADM in 2026.
Incident History - Nile Sugar (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nile Sugar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ADM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ADM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nile Sugar

ADM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.