Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nikkei AmericaNikkei America
VS
GartnerGartner
Nikkei America

Nikkei America

1325 Ave. of the Americas,, New York, 10019, US

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile

Nikkei America, Inc. is one of the subsidiaries of Nikkei, Inc. Nikkei commands an overseas network of extraordinary breadth and quality, including 37 overseas bases located primarily in the United States, Europe and Asia, with approximately 160 reporters and local sta...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gartner

Gartner

56 Top Gallant Street, Stamford, 06904, US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://gtnr.it/3vpPW81
650/1000Weak

We deliver actionable, objective business and technology insights. Our expert guidance and tools enable faster, smarter decisions and stronger performance on an organization’s mission-critical priorities. Our unrivaled combination of business and technology insights st...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:23,403
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nikkei America

Nikkei America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gartner

Gartner

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nikkei America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Gartner has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Nikkei America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nikkei America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gartner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gartner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nikkei America

Nikkei America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gartner

Gartner

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IVAGARCRO1771266582
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
VEEGARTOTHAL1781807154

FAQ

Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nikkei America company and Gartner company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nikkei America and Gartner, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nikkei America and Gartner, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nikkei America or Gartner ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nikkei America or Gartner ?
Between Nikkei America and Gartner, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nikkei America and Gartner, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA