Nike Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NIKDEL1769160139)
The Rankiteo video explains how the company Nike has been impacted by a Ransomware on the date January 01, 2025.
Incident Summary
If the player does not load, you can open the video directly.
Key Highlights From This Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Nike's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteoโs incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Nike Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteoโs MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Nike breach identified under incident ID NIKDEL1769160139.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Nike's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nike, the number of followers: 6129314, the industry type: Retail and the number of employees: 95347 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 698 and after the incident was 452 with a difference of -246 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Nike and their customers.
On 22 January 2026, Nike disclosed Ransomware / Data Extortion issues under the banner "Nike Targeted in WorldLeaks Ransomware Attack, Data Extortion Threatened".
Nike has fallen victim to a data extortion attack by the financially motivated ransomware group WorldLeaks, which announced the breach on its darknet leak site on January 22, 2026.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Several terabytes (estimated), with nearly 481,183 user accounts, 220 employee records, 444 third-party credentials records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement acknowledging the incident.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating initial access is typically gained through phishing, Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched applications...used for initial access, and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vPNs without multi-factor authentication (MFA). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating post-compromise...lateral movement and custom exfiltration tools. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 444 third-party credentials compromised. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating credential theft...post-compromise. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating extortion-only model...to evade detection and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating custom exfiltration tools to extract data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credential theft...post-compromise and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 444 third-party credentials compromised. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 220 employee records compromised and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating internal documentation, operational records compromised. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating lateral movement...post-compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating internal documentation, customer information, HR data compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating operational records, employee contact details compromised. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating darknet leak site and negotiation portal used. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration...several terabytes estimated and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to release stolen data on darknet leak site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating extortion-only model, no encryption mentioned and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack threatening organizations existence. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources
- Nike Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: http://www.rankiteo.com/company/nike/incident/NIKDEL1769160139
- Nike CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/nike
- Nike Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/nikdel1769160139-nike-dell-technologies-ransomware-january-2025/
- Nike CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/nike/history
- Nike CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cybersecuritynews.com/nike-hacked/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/static/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf






