Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nicholson ConstructionNicholson Construction
VS
STRABAGSTRABAG
Nicholson Construction

Nicholson Construction

2400 Ansys Drive, Suite 300, Canonsburg, PA, 15317, US

Last Update: 05/01/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Nicholson has been both a leader and an innovator in the geotechnical construction industry for more than 60 years. With regional offices across the country and headquarters located in Pittsburgh, Nicholson is a nationally-renowned specialty general contractor, offering...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:326
Subsidiaries:165
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
STRABAG

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, 9800, AT

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://karriere.strabag.com
785/1000Fair

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, undergr...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:21,228
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nicholson Construction

Nicholson Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
STRABAG

STRABAG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nicholson Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nicholson Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nicholson Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nicholson Construction

Nicholson Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
STRABAG

STRABAG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nicholson Construction company and STRABAG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nicholson Construction and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nicholson Construction and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nicholson Construction or STRABAG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nicholson Construction or STRABAG ?
Between Nicholson Construction and STRABAG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nicholson Construction and STRABAG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9