Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017
VS
EvidenEviden
Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

Santa Clara, US

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://hpe.com
748/1000Moderate

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Eviden

Eviden

Bezons, 95870, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://eviden.com
780/1000Fair

Eviden is the Atos Group brand for hardware and software products with c. € 1 billion in revenue, operating in 36 countries and comprising four business units: advanced computing, cybersecurity products, mission-critical systems and vision AI. As a next-generation techn...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,870
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eviden

Eviden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eviden in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eviden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eviden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Eviden

Eviden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 company and Eviden company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 and Eviden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 and Eviden, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 or Eviden ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 or Eviden ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 and Eviden, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Niara, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2017 and Eviden, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9