Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
NGINX

NGINX Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

f5.com

We have moved! Follow us at @F5 for all relevant updates.


NGINX A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

NGINX
Company Information
Website:https://www.f5.com
Employees number:173
Number of followers:90,437
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:f5.com
NGINX Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
NGINXIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
20/07/2026
721/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
NGINX Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
NGINXIT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

NGINX
NGINXModerate
Current Score
721Ba (MODERATE)
01000
11 incidents
-4.89 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
717Before Incident
JULY 2026
721Before Incident
Vulnerability
15 Jul 2026NGINX
F5: Critical NGINX Vulnerability Can Crash Workers and May Allow Remote Code Execution

Critical nginx Heap Buffer Overflow Flaw (CVE-2026-42533)

716After Incident
CRITICAL-5
F51784499829
Critical nginx Heap Buffer Overflow Flaw Patched in Latest Updates F5 has released patches for a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-42533) in nginx that allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to trigger a heap buffer overflow via crafted HTTP requests. The flaw, fixed on July 15, affects nginx versions 0.9.6 through 1.31.2 spanning releases dating back to 2011 and impacts both the open-source server (1.30.4 stable, 1.31.3 mainline) and NGINX Plus (37.0.3.1). Exploitation can crash or restart worker processes, leading to denial-of-service (DoS) conditions. If ASLR is disabled or bypassed, F5 warns that remote code execution (RCE) may also be possible. The vulnerability resides in nginx’s script engine, specifically when a regex-based map directive references a numbered capture (e.g., `$1`) in a string expression after an earlier regex match. The two-pass evaluation process where the first pass measures buffer size and the second writes data fails when the shared capture state is overwritten between passes, causing a buffer overflow with attacker-controlled length and content. Not all nginx deployments are vulnerable; exposure depends on specific configurations. F5’s advisory lists affected products, including NGINX Ingress Controller, Gateway Fabric, App Protect WAF, and Instance Manager, though fixed versions for these were not yet disclosed at publication. The flaw carries a CVSS v4 score of 9.2 (8.1 under v3.1), reflecting high attack complexity. The vulnerability was reported independently by over a dozen researchers, with credit for the fix going to Mufeed VH of Winfunc Research and nginx maintainer Maxim Dounin. Security researcher Stan Shaw (cyberstan) published a detailed analysis arguing that the flaw inherently bypasses ASLR on default Ubuntu 24.04 systems, enabling RCE via a single unauthenticated GET request. Shaw’s findings contradict F5’s advisory, which frames RCE as conditional on ASLR being disabled. He withheld proof-of-concept details but confirmed a 10/10 severity in testing. F5’s recommended mitigation switching regex maps to named captures closes the primary attack path but leaves a secondary vector open if the same named group is reused in a location regex. Shaw confirmed this variant via AddressSanitizer, though F5’s advisory does not address it. The only complete fix is upgrading to patched versions. This marks the third heap overflow in nginx’s expression-evaluation code disclosed in two months, following CVE-2026-42945 (Rift) and CVE-2026-9256 (rewrite module). All stem from a shared design flaw: a two-pass engine that trusts its initial buffer measurement, allowing subsequent writes to exceed allocated space. As of July 20, no public exploits or CISA catalog listings existed, but Shaw plans to release a proof-of-concept 21 days post-patch. F5 had not responded to inquiries about downstream product fixes or the named-capture mitigation’s completeness by publication.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Heap Buffer Overflow
IMPACT
Systems Affected: nginx worker processesDowntime: Denial-of-service (DoS) conditionsOperational Impact: Crash or restart of worker processes
JUNE 2026
725Before Incident
Vulnerability
17 Jun 2026NGINX
F5 and NGINX: F5 Patches NGINX Vulnerability Enabling Code Execution and DoS Attacks

F5 Patches Critical NGINX Vulnerabilities Enabling RCE and DoS Attacks

720After Incident
CRITICAL-5
NGIF51781792829
F5 Patches Critical NGINX Vulnerabilities Enabling RCE and DoS Attacks On June 17, 2026, F5 issued an out-of-band security advisory (K000161614) addressing multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in NGINX components, including Open Source, NGINX Plus, NGINX Instance Manager, and related modules. The flaws, which could lead to remote code execution (RCE) and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, prompted urgent patching recommendations from F5 and national CERTs. The most severe issue, CVE-2026-42530 (CVSS 8.1/9.2), affects the NGINX `ngx_http_v3_module` when HTTP/3 QUIC is enabled. A remote attacker could exploit a use-after-free flaw in the QPACK encoder stream to crash NGINX worker processes, causing DoS or potential RCE on systems with disabled or bypassable ASLR. Affected versions include NGINX Open Source (1.31.0–1.31.1), NGINX Gateway Fabric (2.0.0–2.6.3), and NGINX Ingress Controller (5.0.0–5.5.0), with fixes available in NGINX Open Source 1.31.2 and Gateway Fabric 2.6.4. A second high-severity flaw, CVE-2026-42055 (CVSS 8.1/9.2), impacts NGINX Plus and Open Source when using the `ngx_http_proxy_v2_module` or gRPC with HTTP/2 backends. Malicious HTTP/2 or gRPC traffic could trigger memory-handling errors, leading to crashes or RCE. Patched versions include NGINX Plus 37.0.2.1 and NGINX Open Source 1.31.2/1.30.3, though some products like NGINX Instance Manager and App Protect modules remain unpatched. Additional vulnerabilities in NGINX Gateway Fabric (CVE-2026-11311, CVE-2026-50107) could disrupt routing and service integrity, with fixes available in version 2.6.4. F5 recommends immediate upgrades for affected deployments and interim mitigations, such as disabling HTTP/3/QUIC, restricting HTTP/2/gRPC exposure, and enforcing access controls. Administrators are advised to monitor F5’s security notifications for further updates.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)Denial-of-Service (DoS)
IMPACT
NGINX Open Source (1.31.0–1.31.1)NGINX PlusNGINX Instance ManagerNGINX Gateway Fabric (2.0.0–2.6.3)NGINX Ingress Controller (5.0.0–5.5.0)Service disruptionPotential system crashes
MAY 2026
729Before Incident
Vulnerability
23 May 2026NGINX
NGINX Plus, F5 and NGINX Open Source: Nginx-poolslip Vulnerability Enables DoS and Code Execution Attacks — Patch Now!

Critical NGINX Vulnerability 'nginx-poolslip' Exposes Millions of Servers to Remote Attacks

724After Incident
CRITICAL-5
F5NGI1779539045
Critical NGINX Vulnerability "nginx-poolslip" Exposes Millions of Servers to Remote Attacks A newly disclosed high-severity vulnerability in NGINX, tracked as CVE-2026-9256 (dubbed nginx-poolslip), is forcing administrators into an emergency patch cycle. The flaw affects both NGINX Open Source (versions 0.1.17–1.30.1 and 1.31.0) and NGINX Plus (R32–R36 and 37.0.0), enabling remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit it over plain HTTP. The vulnerability resides in the ngx_http_rewrite_module, the same component targeted in the earlier "NGINX Rift" flaw (CVE-2026-42945). It occurs when a rewrite directive uses regex patterns with overlapping PCRE capture groups (e.g., `^/((.))$`) paired with replacement strings referencing multiple captures (e.g., `$1$2`). This triggers a heap buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the NGINX worker process, potentially leading to control-flow hijacking* via manipulated memory pool cleanup handlers. Unlike the Rift bug which exploited a buffer-size miscalculation nginx-poolslip abuses a pointer "slip" across adjacent linked structures in the same memory pool, bypassing the previous patch. Exploitation can result in denial-of-service (DoS) crashes or, in environments with disabled ASLR or bypassable protections, remote code execution (RCE). The flaw is rated High (8.1 CVSS v3.1) and Critical (9.2 CVSS v4.0). ### Affected Systems & Mitigations The vulnerability impacts a vast footprint, including reverse proxies, API gateways, and Kubernetes ingress controllers. Fixed versions include: - NGINX Open Source: Upgrade to 1.30.2 or 1.31.1. - NGINX Plus: Update to R36 P5, R32 P7, or R37.0.1.1. Downstream products such as NGINX Instance Manager, F5 WAF for NGINX, NGINX App Protect (WAF/DoS), NGINX Gateway Fabric, and NGINX Ingress Controller inherit the vulnerability but lack immediate fixes. The 0.x branch of NGINX Open Source will not receive patches. As a temporary workaround, F5 recommends replacing unnamed regex captures with named captures (e.g., `rewrite (?<user_id>.*)` instead of `$1`). The flaw was discovered by Mufeed VH (Winfunc Research), Nebula Security, and Vexera AI, with proof-of-concept exploits already circulating. No control-plane exposure exists; the issue is confined to the data plane.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Reverse proxies, API gateways, Kubernetes ingress controllersOperational Impact: Denial-of-service (DoS) crashes, potential remote code execution (RCE)
MAY 2026
733Before Incident
Vulnerability
20 May 2026NGINX
NGINX: Cyber Security News ®’s Post

Critical NGINX JavaScript Vulnerability (CVE-2026-8711) Enables Remote Code Execution

729After Incident
CRITICAL-4
NGI1779279820
Critical NGINX JavaScript Vulnerability (CVE-2026-8711) Enables Remote Code Execution A newly disclosed vulnerability in NGINX JavaScript (njs), tracked as CVE-2026-8711, exposes systems to severe security risks, including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks and remote code execution (RCE). The flaw stems from a heap-based buffer overflow in the `ngx_http_js_module`, specifically in how the `js_fetch_proxy` directive processes client-controlled variables (e.g., `$http_host`, `$uri`, or `$args`) when combined with the `()` operation in NGINX JavaScript. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests, potentially gaining control over the NGINX worker process. The issue affects configurations where `js_fetch_proxy` is enabled with user-supplied input, making it a critical concern for organizations relying on NGINX for web traffic management. No patch has been publicly disclosed at this time, leaving affected deployments vulnerable until mitigations are implemented. The impact extends to environments where NGINX is used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, or web server, particularly in high-traffic or security-sensitive applications. Further details on exploitation conditions and affected versions are expected to emerge as security researchers analyze the flaw.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
IMPACT
Systems Affected: NGINX deployments with js_fetch_proxy enabled using client-controlled variablesOperational Impact: Potential denial-of-service (DoS) or remote code execution (RCE)
MAY 2026
738Before Incident
Vulnerability
14 May 2026NGINX
NGINX: Cyber Security News ®’s Post

Critical 18-Year-Old NGINX Vulnerability Exposes Systems to Remote Code Execution

733After Incident
CRITICAL-5
NGI1778747274
Critical 18-Year-Old NGINX Vulnerability Exposes Systems to Remote Code Execution A severe heap buffer overflow vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-42945 (CVSS 9.2), has been disclosed in NGINX, one of the world’s most widely deployed web servers. The flaw, present in the ngx_http_rewrite_module since 2008, enables unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) under specific configuration conditions. The vulnerability arises when an unnamed PCRE capture (e.g., `$1`, `$2`) is used in a replacement string containing a `?`, followed immediately by another `rewrite`, `if`, or `set` directive. While the flaw is critical, exploitation requires an exact configuration match, limiting its immediate impact to affected deployments. Patches have been released in NGINX versions 1.30.1 and 1.31.0, with mitigation also possible by rewriting configurations to use named captures instead. A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit has been made public, increasing the urgency for organizations to assess and remediate their NGINX instances. The disclosure underscores the risks of long-standing vulnerabilities in foundational software, particularly as attackers refine exploitation techniques. Enterprises relying on NGINX are advised to verify their configurations and apply updates promptly.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: NGINX web servers with specific configurationsOperational Impact: Potential remote code execution leading to system compromise
APRIL 2026
743Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Apr 2026NGINX
Nginx UI and Organizations using Nginx UI: Nginx-ui Vulnerability Actively Exploited in Attack – Enables Full Server Takeover

Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability (CVE-2026-33032) Actively Exploited in the Wild

738After Incident
CRITICAL-5
NGI1776335195
Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability (CVE-2026-33032) Actively Exploited in the Wild A severe authentication bypass flaw in Nginx UI, tracked as CVE-2026-33032 (CVSS 9.8), is under active exploitation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to seize control of affected Nginx web servers. Discovered by Pluto Security, the vulnerability stems from a missing authentication check in the application’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. The flaw affects the /mcp_message endpoint, which lacks authentication middleware entirely, while the /mcp endpoint enforces proper security controls. Compounding the issue, the IP whitelist mechanism defaults to a fail-open state an empty whitelist permits all traffic, enabling attackers to send unauthenticated HTTP POST requests and execute administrative tools. With 2,689 publicly exposed Nginx UI instances identified via Shodan, the risk is widespread. Exploitation grants attackers full control, including: - Service takeover via configuration file modifications (e.g., nginx_config_add), triggering immediate server reloads. - Traffic interception by redirecting requests to attacker-controlled endpoints to harvest credentials and session tokens. - Credential harvesting through injected logging directives capturing admin authorization headers. - Configuration exfiltration, exposing backend topologies and TLS certificate paths. - Service disruption by forcing invalid configurations to crash Nginx. A public proof-of-concept exploit is circulating, and active attacks have been confirmed by Pluto Security, VulnCheck (which added the flaw to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list), and Recorded Future’s Insikt Group. The release of exploit code on GitHub has lowered the barrier for low-skilled attackers. The vulnerability was patched in Nginx UI version 2.3.4, which adds authentication to the /mcp_message endpoint. Temporary mitigations include disabling MCP or restricting the IP whitelist to trusted addresses. Organizations are advised to review logs and configurations for signs of compromise.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Authentication Bypass
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credentials, session tokens, backend topologies, TLS certificate pathsSystems Affected: Nginx web servers running Nginx UI with MCP integrationDowntime: Possible via forced invalid configurationsOperational Impact: Service takeover, traffic interception, service disruptionIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential harvesting)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsSession tokensBackend topologiesTLS certificate pathsSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Yes (configuration exfiltration)Personally Identifiable Information: Possible (session tokens, credentials)
MARCH 2026
747Before Incident
Vulnerability
05 Mar 2026NGINX
Nginx: Patch now! Exploitation of Nginx UI vulnerability ‘imminent’, warns threat analyst

Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability (CVE-2026-27944) Under Active Exploitation

742After Incident
CRITICAL-5
NGI1773116620
Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability (CVE-2026-27944) Under Active Exploitation A newly disclosed critical vulnerability in Nginx’s user interface (CVE-2026-27944) is already being probed by threat actors, just days after its public release on 5 March. The flaw, rated 9.8 on the CVSS scale, affects versions of Nginx UI prior to 2.3.3 and stems from two key issues: missing authentication on the `api/backup` endpoint and encryption keys exposed in HTTP response headers. Exploitation allows unauthenticated attackers to download and decrypt full server backups, potentially exposing credentials, configuration data, and encryption keys. A proof-of-concept exploit is already available, increasing the risk of widespread attacks. Security researchers at watchTowr have detected active scanning targeting the vulnerable endpoint over the past four days, with attackers attempting to identify and compromise exposed systems. While the flaw impacts Nginx UI not the core Nginx web server its severity has prompted urgent warnings to patch immediately. The vulnerability highlights the risks of exposing management interfaces to the public internet, though affected organizations can mitigate the threat by upgrading to Nginx UI 2.3.3 or later.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Credentials, configuration data, encryption keysSystems Affected: Nginx UI (versions prior to 2.3.3)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials, configuration data, encryption keysSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesData Encryption: Yes (but keys exposed)
MARCH 2026
752Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Mar 2026NGINX
nginx UI and Organizations using nginx UI: Critical nginx UI tool vulnerability opens web servers to full compromise

Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability Exploited for Over a Month, Exposing Web Servers to Full Compromise

747After Incident
CRITICAL-5
NGI1776291864
Critical Nginx UI Vulnerability Exploited for Over a Month, Exposing Web Servers to Full Compromise A critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-55182, CVSS 9.8) in the open-source nginx UI web server configuration tool has been actively exploited by cybercriminals since March, security vendor Pluto Security revealed this week. The flaw, dubbed ‘MCPwn’, stems from an unauthenticated Model Context Protocol (MCP) endpoint introduced in late 2025 to facilitate AI model integration allowing attackers to hijack nginx servers with a single API call. Exploitation enables threat actors to intercept traffic, harvest admin credentials, maintain persistent access, and manipulate nginx configurations, including injecting malicious settings or disabling the service entirely. Pluto Security identified 2,689 vulnerable nginx UI instances exposed to the internet via Shodan, despite the tool’s relatively small user base compared to nginx’s global footprint. The vulnerability mirrors risks seen during the API boom a decade ago, where rapid integration outpaced security controls. MCP endpoints, designed to bridge nginx and AI models, were implemented without authentication, creating a privileged attack surface. Pluto Security’s CEO warned that AI integration layers must be treated as part of the core attack surface, not an afterthought. The flaw was first disclosed on the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) on March 30, coinciding with reports from VulnCheck and Recorded Future’s Insikt Group confirming active exploitation. While a patch (nginx UI 2.3.4) was released on March 15, organizations unable to update immediately can mitigate risks by disabling MCP or restricting access via IP whitelisting. Security teams are advised to review logs for unusual configuration changes. Nginx UI, a dashboard for managing nginx servers without CLI access, has seen accelerated adoption of MCP tools to support AI agents often without full risk assessments. The incident underscores how privileged integration layers can inadvertently expand attack surfaces when security is deprioritized.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Admin credentials, traffic interceptionSystems Affected: nginx UI instances (2,689 exposed to the internet)Operational Impact: Malicious configuration injection, service disruption
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Admin credentials, traffic dataSensitivity Of Data: High (admin credentials, traffic interception)
FEBRUARY 2026
752Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
757Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2026NGINX
NGINX and Boato Panel: Threat actors hijack web traffic after exploiting React2Shell vulnerability: Report

Threat Actors Exploit React2Shell Vulnerability to Hijack NGINX Web Traffic

752After Incident
CRITICAL-5
BOANGI1770244421
Threat Actors Exploit React2Shell Vulnerability to Hijack NGINX Web Traffic Researchers at Datadog Security Labs have uncovered a multi-stage, automated campaign where threat actors exploit the React2Shell vulnerability to compromise NGINX web servers, redirecting traffic for malicious purposes. The attacks primarily target organizations in Asia particularly those with domains ending in .in, .id, .pe, .bd, .edu, .gov, and .th as well as Chinese hosting infrastructure, often running Boato Panel for server management. Once inside a network, attackers deploy toolkits containing scripts for target discovery, persistence, and malicious configuration file creation. These files manipulate NGINX’s routing rules to hijack web traffic, enabling activities such as: - Fingerprinting organizational traffic - Injecting malware into users’ devices - Redirecting visitors to phishing pages to steal credentials The shift toward NGINX exploitation reflects a broader trend: as defenses like MFA and password managers strengthen, attackers are reverting to infrastructure-level attacks such as session cookie theft to bypass modern security controls. Notably, two IP addresses now account for 56% of observed exploitation attempts, a sharp consolidation from over 1,000 unique sources earlier. Defensive measures highlighted by researchers include: - Monitoring NGINX configuration file integrity to detect unauthorized changes - Applying the latest security patches, particularly for React and NGINX - Locking down configuration files to prevent tampering The attacks underscore the risks of unpatched vulnerabilities and poorly secured web infrastructure, with compromised sites facing reputational damage if flagged for hosting malware. The use of AI-driven exploitation tools further lowers the barrier for attackers, making server-side vulnerabilities a fast and cost-effective target.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Web Traffic Hijacking
MOTIVATION
Credential theftMalware distributionTraffic redirection
IMPACT
Systems Affected: NGINX web serversOperational Impact: Traffic hijacking, malware injection, phishing redirectionBrand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage if flagged for hosting malwareIdentity Theft Risk: High (credential theft via phishing)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Credentials (via phishing)Sensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
DECEMBER 2025
757Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
757Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
757Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
756Before Incident
JANUARY 2020
753Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Jan 2020NGINX
Microsoft, 7-Eleven, Cisco, NGINX and Broadcom: 7-Eleven - Security Affairs

Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 Highlights Major Exploits and Cyber Incidents

749After Incident
CRITICAL-4
BROMIC7-ENGICIS1779164825
Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 Highlights Major Exploits as Zero-Days and Breaches Surge The second and third days of Pwn2Own Berlin 2026 saw researchers earn $385,750 in bounties, pushing the event’s total payout to $1.298 million. Among the notable exploits, Microsoft Exchange Server was successfully compromised, contributing to the growing tally. DEVCORE was crowned "Master of Pwn" after demonstrating multiple high-impact vulnerabilities. In parallel, Chaotic Eclipse disclosed MiniPlasma, a zero-day in Windows, suggesting an incomplete or overlooked security fix from 2020. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added a Microsoft Exchange Server flaw and a Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, signaling active exploitation risks. A critical 18-year-old flaw (CVE-2026-42945) in NGINX, the world’s most widely deployed web server, was also uncovered, with experts warning of ongoing attacks. Meanwhile, Grafana confirmed a GitHub token breach after a cybercrime group claimed responsibility, while ShinyHunters breached 7-Eleven, exposing franchisee data and Salesforce records. Additional incidents included: - A public Amazon S3 bucket leaking sensitive guest data from Japanese hotel platform Tabiq. - OpenAI suffering a supply chain attack via malicious TanStack packages. - Broadcom releasing a security update for a VMware Fusion root access bug. - The Ghostwriter group resuming cyberattacks on Ukrainian government targets. - Researchers identifying YellowKey and GreenPlasma, two new Windows zero-days. - A Linux Kernel bug (Fragnesia) enabling local root access attacks. - Attackers exploiting a Funnel Builder vulnerability to inject e-skimmers into e-commerce stores. The event underscored persistent threats across enterprise software, cloud services, and critical infrastructure, with zero-days and supply chain attacks remaining dominant vectors.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Zero-day ExploitData BreachSupply Chain AttackRansomware
MOTIVATION
Financial GainCyber EspionageData TheftDemonstration of Exploits
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $385,750 (bounties paid) + $1.298 million (total payout)GitHub tokensFranchisee dataSalesforce recordsGuest data (Tabiq)Personally Identifiable InformationMicrosoft Exchange ServerWindows OSNGINXCisco Catalyst SD-WANVMware FusionGrafana7-Eleven systemsOpenAI (via TanStack packages)E-commerce stores (via e-skimmers)Service DisruptionUnauthorized AccessData ExfiltrationGrafana7-ElevenOpenAITabiqHigh (PII exposed)High (e-skimmers injected)
DATA BREACH
GitHub TokensFranchisee DataSalesforce RecordsGuest DataPIIHighYes (ShinyHunters, Ghostwriter group)Yes
MARCH 2011
753Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Mar 2011NGINX
NGINX: 15-Year-Old NGINX Vulnerability Lets Attackers Crash Workers and Achieve Remote Code Execution

15-Year-Old NGINX Vulnerability (CVE-2026-42533) Enables Remote Code Execution

752After Incident
CRITICAL-1
NGI1784521421
15-Year-Old NGINX Vulnerability (CVE-2026-42533) Enables Remote Code Execution A critical vulnerability in NGINX, tracked as CVE-2026-42533, has been disclosed after remaining exploitable since March 2011. The flaw, reported by security researcher Stan Shaw, stems from a missing save/restore mechanism in NGINX’s script engine, specifically affecting the handling of PCRE capture state in regex-based directives. The vulnerability arises when a map directive with regex patterns executes between references to capture groups (e.g., `$1`), corrupting a shared mutable array (`r->captures`). This mismatch between NGINX’s LEN (buffer sizing) and VALUE (data writing) passes creates two attack vectors: - Heap buffer overflow: If the clobbered capture is larger than the original, the VALUE pass writes beyond the allocated buffer, allowing arbitrary memory corruption. - Information leak: If the clobbered capture is smaller, the oversized buffer exposes uninitialized heap data, including libc and heap pointers, enabling ASLR bypass in a single unauthenticated request. When chained, these primitives enable reliable remote code execution (RCE) with high success rates tested at 10/10 reliability on Ubuntu 24.04 with full ASLR enabled. Exploitation requires roughly one leak request, 40 spray connections, and one overflow-triggering request. ### Scope and Impact The flaw affects 13 call sites across 9 source files, impacting both HTTP and stream modules. Any configuration combining regex captures (e.g., `location`, `server_name`, `rewrite`, `if` blocks) with regex-based map variables evaluated in the same request context is vulnerable. Commonly affected directives include: - `proxy_set_header`, `proxy_pass`, `fastcgi_param`, `uwsgi_param`, `grpc_set_header` - `return`, `add_header`, `rewrite`, `set`, `root`, `alias`, `access_log` A separate, independently exploitable variant exists via named capture groups (`(?P<name>...)`), which are cached differently and remain unpatched in fixes addressing only numbered captures. ### Affected Versions and Fixes | Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Version | |---------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------| | NGINX Open Source (stable)| 0.9.6 – 1.30.3 | 1.30.4 | | NGINX Open Source (mainline)| Up to 1.31.2 | 1.31.3 | | NGINX Plus R33–R36 | All versions | R36 P7 | | NGINX Plus (newer line) | 37.0.0.1 – 37.0.2.1 | 37.0.3.1 | Notably, prior patches for other NGINX vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-42945, CVE-2026-9256, CVE-2026-42055, CVE-2026-48142) do not address this flaw, leaving organizations exposed even after applying those updates. ### Historical Context The issue was first flagged in a 2014 NGINX Trac ticket by developer Maxim Dounin, who acknowledged it as a defect but did not classify it as security-critical at the time. The researcher has released a static config scanner to help defenders identify vulnerable directive orderings without exploitation. Proof-of-concept details are being withheld for 21 days post-patch to prevent immediate weaponization, following the rapid exploitation observed after the disclosure of CVE-2026-42945 ("NGINX Rift").
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Heap data (libc and heap pointers)Systems Affected: NGINX Open Source (0.9.6 – 1.30.3, 1.31.2), NGINX Plus R33–R36, NGINX Plus 37.0.0.1 – 37.0.2.1Operational Impact: Potential remote code execution on vulnerable systems
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Heap memory (libc/heap pointers)Sensitivity Of Data: High (ASLR bypass)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for NGINX ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on NGINX's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with NGINX ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view NGINX's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?