Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NGINXNGINX
VS
Ricoh USA, Inc.Ricoh USA, Inc.
NGINX

NGINX

795 Folsom St, San Francisco, US

Last Update: 20/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.f5.com
721/1000Moderate

We have moved! Follow us at @F5 for all relevant updates.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:173
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
9
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ricoh USA, Inc.

Ricoh USA, Inc.

300 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, 19341, US

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ricoh-usa.com/
777/1000Fair

At Ricoh, we bring people, processes, and technology together to make information work for you. We unlock the power of information so organizations can unlock the full potential of their people. We're a leader in information management and digital services, creating com...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:18,441
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NGINX

NGINX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ricoh USA, Inc.

Ricoh USA, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

NGINX has 512.24% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ricoh USA, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NGINX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NGINX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ricoh USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ricoh USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NGINX

NGINX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
F51784499829
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NGIF51781792829
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
F5NGI1779539045
Ricoh USA, Inc.

Ricoh USA, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NGINX company and Ricoh USA, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NGINX and Ricoh USA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NGINX and Ricoh USA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NGINX or Ricoh USA, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NGINX or Ricoh USA, Inc. ?
Between NGINX and Ricoh USA, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NGINX and Ricoh USA, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3