Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NFINFI
VS
Transnet SOC LtdTransnet SOC Ltd
NFI

NFI

2 Cooper St, Camden, 08102, US

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nfiindustries.com
720/1000Moderate

NFI is a fully integrated North American supply chain solutions provider headquartered in Camden, New Jersey. Privately held by the Brown family since 1932, we generate over $3.8 billion annually and employ 17,000+ associates. Guided by our values of family, integrity, ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:10,472
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, 2001, ZA

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.transnet.net
700/1000Moderate

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:27,935
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NFI

NFI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NFI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

Transnet SOC Ltd has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NFI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NFI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NFI

NFI

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NFI1788864149
Transnet SOC Ltd

Transnet SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA1788503263
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA603092125

FAQ

Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NFI company and Transnet SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NFI and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NFI and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NFI or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NFI or Transnet SOC Ltd ?
Between NFI and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NFI and Transnet SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8