Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Next Generation by DTU SkylabNext Generation by DTU Skylab
VS
Temple UniversityTemple University
Next Generation by DTU Skylab

Next Generation by DTU Skylab

Centrifugevej 374, Kongen Lyngby, 2200, DK

Last Update: 10/04/2026

View Profile
767/1000Fair

Next Generation City Action combines international forces of entrepreneurs, students and influencers, who represent the next generation of leaders for the future of inclusive and sustainable cities. Through a hybrid engagement, 100 driven change-makers tackle the most p...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Temple University

Temple University

1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19122

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.temple.edu
788/1000Fair

As the largest university in one of the nation’s most iconic cities, Temple educates diverse future leaders from across Philadelphia, the country and the world who share a common drive to learn, prepare for their careers and make a real impact. Founded as a night school...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,006
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Next Generation by DTU Skylab

Next Generation by DTU Skylab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Temple University

Temple University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next Generation by DTU Skylab in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Temple University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Next Generation by DTU Skylab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next Generation by DTU Skylab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Temple University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Temple University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Next Generation by DTU Skylab

Next Generation by DTU Skylab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Temple University

Temple University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
TEM203726323

FAQ

Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab company and Temple University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab and Temple University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab and Temple University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Next Generation by DTU Skylab or Temple University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Next Generation by DTU Skylab or Temple University ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab and Temple University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Next Generation by DTU Skylab and Temple University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA