Comparison Overview

Nexia

VS

Mazars

Nexia

71 Kingsway, London, undefined, WC2B 6ST, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

Nexia is a leading worldwide network of independent accounting and consulting firms. We provide a comprehensive portfolio of audit, accountancy, tax, advisory and business services. Nexia works with its member firms leveraging strength across the network and enabling the delivery of global solutions by member firms to clients. Nexia was established over 25 years ago. Our continued success is thanks to what lies at the heart of our business: international knowledge, proven experience and enduring relationships. This is reflected in our purpose, ‘To support our clients across the globe on their path to growth.’ When you choose Nexia, you get a more responsive, more personal, partner-led service, across the world. Our member firms share common values, which enable them to provide tailored solutions and high-quality advice across a wide portfolio of services. Quality is embedded in everything we do at Nexia, from members developing valuable relationships with each other and their clients to the delivery of quality services by member firms across the world.

NAICS: 5412
NAICS Definition: Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees: 815
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Mazars

Tour Exaltis, 61 rue Henri Regnault, Paris La Defense, FR, 92075
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Mazars is an internationally integrated partnership, specialising in audit, accountancy, advisory, tax and legal services*. Operating in over 100 countries and territories around the world, we draw on the expertise of more than 50,000 professionals – 33,000+ in Mazars’ integrated partnership and 17,000+ via the Mazars North America Alliance – to assist clients of all sizes at every stage in their development. *Where permitted under applicable country laws

NAICS: 5412
NAICS Definition: Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees: 13,721
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nexia-international.jpeg
Nexia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mazars.jpeg
Mazars
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nexia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mazars
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nexia in 2025.

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mazars in 2025.

Incident History — Nexia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nexia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mazars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mazars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nexia-international.jpeg
Nexia
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mazars.jpeg
Mazars
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft (Stolen Laptop)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mazars company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nexia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mazars company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Nexia company.

In the current year, Mazars company has reported more cyber incidents than Nexia company.

Nexia company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mazars company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mazars company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Nexia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mazars company nor Nexia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nexia company nor Mazars company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mazars company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nexia company.

Mazars company employs more people globally than Nexia company, reflecting its scale as a Accounting.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nexia nor Mazars holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N