Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NEXECURNEXECUR
VS
RP Sanjiv Goenka GroupRP Sanjiv Goenka Group
NEXECUR

NEXECUR

13, rue de Belle Ile, Coulaines, 72190, FR

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nexecur.fr/
775/1000Fair

Spécialiste de la télésurveillance, des systèmes d’alarmes et de la téléassistance depuis près de 40 ans, Nexecur s'engage pour votre sécurité en s'appuyant sur l'expérience et la connaissance de vos besoins. Filiale sécurité du Crédit Agricole, Nexecur développe des s...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:418
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Kolkata, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rpsg.in
798/1000Fair

The RPSG Group is one of India's fastest growing conglomerates with a significant global presence. The Group's businesses include power and energy, carbon black manufacturing, retail, IT-enabled services, FMCG, media and entertainment, and agriculture. In the last few ...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:33,866
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NEXECUR

NEXECUR

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEXECUR in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RP Sanjiv Goenka Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NEXECUR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEXECUR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RP Sanjiv Goenka Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NEXECUR

NEXECUR

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NEXECUR company and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NEXECUR and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NEXECUR and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NEXECUR or RP Sanjiv Goenka Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NEXECUR or RP Sanjiv Goenka Group ?
Between NEXECUR and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NEXECUR and RP Sanjiv Goenka Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1