Comparison Overview
NEX Building Group

NEX Building Group
18 Honeysuckle Dr, Newcastle, 2300, AU
Last Update: 17/02/2026
We believe in the power of tomorrow. In shaping better human experiences and providing places with heart. We are proud of our history, but we never let that keep us in the past. We are a business that only moves forward. We are future thinkers. The NEX Group comprises...

ALEC Holdings
Marina Walk, 3601 - Marina Plaza, Dubai Marina, Dubai, U.A.E., Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 27639
Last Update: 04/04/2026
ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NEX Building Group







ALEC Holdings






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NEX Building Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2026.
Incident History - NEX Building Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NEX Building Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NEX Building Group

ALEC Holdings
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.