Comparison Overview
New Holland Construction Latin America

New Holland Construction Latin America
Avenida General David Sarnoff, Contagem, 32210-110, BR
Last Update: 31/01/2026
A New Holland Construction é um dos principais fabricantes globais de equipamentos para construção, nascida com a rica herança de marcas que fizeram a história deste setor. Com uma rede de concessionários, fábricas e centros de pesquisa e desenvolvimento espalhados pelo...

Atlas Copco Group
Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 10523, SE
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Atlas Copco Group enables technology that transforms the future. We innovate to develop products, services and solutions that are key to our customers’ success. Our four business areas offer compressed air and vacuum solutions, energy solutions, dewatering and industria...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

New Holland Construction Latin America







Atlas Copco Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for New Holland Construction Latin America in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco Group in 2026.
Incident History - New Holland Construction Latin America (X = Date, Y = Severity)
New Holland Construction Latin America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlas Copco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlas Copco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

New Holland Construction Latin America

Atlas Copco Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.