Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health InformationNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information
VS
LuxoftLuxoft
Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, CA

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nlchi.nl.ca/
719/1000Moderate

The Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information (the Centre) is responsible for developing and implementing the province’s confidential and secure electronic health record (EHR). The Centre also works to improve the health of all Newfoundlanders and Labrador...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:165
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Luxoft

Luxoft

Gubelstrasse 24, Zug, 6300, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.luxoft.com
807/1000Good

Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company (NYSE: DXC), is a digital strategy and software engineering firm providing bespoke technology solutions that drive business change for customers the world over. Acquired by U.S. company DXC Technology in 2019, Luxoft is a global operatio...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:15,550
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Luxoft

Luxoft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luxoft in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Luxoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luxoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NEW1950211122
🔒 Incident : Breach
NEW211718922
Luxoft

Luxoft

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information company and Luxoft company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information and Luxoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information and Luxoft, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information or Luxoft ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information or Luxoft ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information and Luxoft, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information and Luxoft, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2