Comparison Overview

Newell Brands

VS

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

Newell Brands

6655 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30328, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newellbrands.com

Newell Brands (NASDAQ: NWL) is a leading global consumer goods company with a strong portfolio of well-known brands, including Rubbermaid, Sharpie, Graco, Coleman, Rubbermaid Commercial Products, Yankee Candle, Paper Mate, FoodSaver, Dymo, EXPO, Elmer’s, Oster, NUK, Spontex and Campingaz. We are focused on delighting consumers by lighting up everyday moments.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,255
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

1000 Stanley Drive, New Britain, CT, 06053, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stanleyblackanddecker.com

For the builders and protectors, for the makers and explorers, for those shaping and reshaping our world through hard work and inspiration, Stanley Black & Decker provides the tools and innovative solutions you can trust to get the job done—and we have since 1843. You repair your home and car with the tools we provide. Your car and your phone are secured with our fasteners. And the roads you drive on, the bridges you cross, the energy you consume, all of these most likely came to you via one of our infrastructure systems. We join forces to bring together the best of the best to create practical, meaningful products and services that make life easier—empowering people to do better, safer, more significant work. Innovation and excellence have powered our success, but we know there’s more we can do for the world and those who make it. Across our businesses, we’re investing in breakthrough innovation and digital excellence, striving for outperformance and increasing our focus on social responsibility. We define success as: delivering value to our customers, colleagues and communities. Our commitment to quality, safety and sustainability helps us on our path to becoming the type of uniquely human-centered global industrial company that keeps every stakeholder in mind, while helping to make the world better.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 25,799
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newellbrands.jpeg
Newell Brands
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanley-black-decker-inc.jpeg
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Newell Brands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newell Brands in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Newell Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newell Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newellbrands.jpeg
Newell Brands
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanley-black-decker-inc.jpeg
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newell Brands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Newell Brands company.

In the current year, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company and Newell Brands company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company nor Newell Brands company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Newell Brands company nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Newell Brands company.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. company employs more people globally than Newell Brands company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Newell Brands nor Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References