Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

New York PostNew York Post
VS
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaABertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
New York Post

New York Post

1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://nypost.com
764/1000Fair

Every day, the most powerful and influential people in the most powerful and influential city read the New York Post. From our digital network that reaches over 90m viewers per month to our daily print editions seven days a week, our iconic media brand is not slowing do...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:1,372
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Carl-Bertelsmann-Straße 270, Gütersloh, 33311, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunter...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:20,317
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
New York Post

New York Post

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York Post in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - New York Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
New York Post

New York Post

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NEW222551222
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between New York Post company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between New York Post and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between New York Post and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - New York Post or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - New York Post or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Between New York Post and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between New York Post and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3