Comparison Overview

New York City Fire Museum

VS

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center

New York City Fire Museum

278 Spring Street, New York, NY, US, 10013
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The New York City Fire Museum houses one of the nation's most important collections of fire related art and artifacts from the late 18th century to the present. Among its holdings are painted leather buckets, helmets, parade hats and belts, lanterns and tools, pre Civil War hand pumped fire engines, horse drawn vehicles and early motorized apparatus. Additionally, we are the first Museum to house a permanent exhibit to the 343 fallen heroes from September 11, 2001.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center

535 Means St NW, Atlanta, GA, 30318, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Atlanta Contemporary Art Center, founded in 1973 as a grassroots artist’s cooperative known as Nexus, is a dynamic non-collecting arts institution that plays a vital role in Atlanta’s cultural landscape. We exhibit the work of consequential artists from local, regional, national, and international art scenes, creating in various media, and exploring a broad range of content. We pay particular attention to artists who have not had significant exhibitions in the Southeast. Our public programs include talks, lectures, panel discussions, workshops, screenings, tours, and events which foster appreciation and understanding in diverse audiences. In addition to our programming, ACAC supports working artists by providing subsidized studio space at reasonable rates, fostering a collaborative environment supportive of the creative process.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-fire-museum.jpeg
New York City Fire Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary-art-center.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New York City Fire Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Fire Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Contemporary Art Center in 2026.

Incident History — New York City Fire Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Fire Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlanta Contemporary Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-fire-museum.jpeg
New York City Fire Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary-art-center.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New York City Fire Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to New York City Fire Museum company.

In the current year, Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company and New York City Fire Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company nor New York City Fire Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company nor New York City Fire Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company nor New York City Fire Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New York City Fire Museum company nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither New York City Fire Museum company nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New York City Fire Museum company employs more people globally than Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New York City Fire Museum nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H