Comparison Overview
New World Qingyuan Hotel

New World Qingyuan Hotel
清远市清新区三坑镇, Qingyuan, Guangdong, 511855, CN
Last Update: 29/11/2025
New World Qingyuan is a total reimagining of the luxury resort experience for today’s urbanites to renew, recharge and reconnect with others through experiential activities rooted in nature. The hotel is surrounded by the pristine natural environment of the Qingxin Natu...

Aramark
2400 Market St, Philadelphia, 19103, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) proudly serves the world’s leading educational institutions, Fortune 500 companies, world champion sports teams, prominent healthcare providers, iconic destinations and cultural attractions, and numerous municipalities in 16 countries around the wor...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

New World Qingyuan Hotel







Aramark






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for New World Qingyuan Hotel in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aramark in 2026.
Incident History - New World Qingyuan Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
New World Qingyuan Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aramark (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aramark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

New World Qingyuan Hotel

Aramark
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.