Comparison Overview

New England Ski Museum

VS

Tate

New England Ski Museum

135 Tramway Dr., Franconia, 03580, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.newenglandskimuseum.org

The New England Ski Museum is a member-supported 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to the history of skiing and the 10th Mountain Division. Our mission: to collect, preserve, and share ski history—through equipment, art, and artifacts—for research, education, inspiration, and celebration. We operate two branches: in North Conway Village, NH and at Cannon Mountain in Franconia Notch State Park, NH. Both are open seven days a week with free admission. With one of the largest and most comprehensive ski and snowsport archives in the world, we welcome more than 25,000 visitors annually—at no cost. For more information or to become a member, visit skimuseum.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tate

Millbank, London, England, SW1P 4RG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tate.org.uk

Our mission is to increase the public’s enjoyment and understanding of art. When Tate first opened its doors to the public in 1897 it had just one gallery, displaying a small collection of British artworks. Today we have four major galleries and the national collection of British art from 1500 to the present day and international modern and contemporary art, which includes nearly 80,000 artworks. Tate is a public institution owned by, and existing for, the public.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,669
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-ski-museum.jpeg
New England Ski Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
New England Ski Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tate
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New England Ski Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tate in 2025.

Incident History — New England Ski Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New England Ski Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-england-ski-museum.jpeg
New England Ski Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tate.jpeg
Tate
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

New England Ski Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tate company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas New England Ski Museum company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tate company and New England Ski Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tate company nor New England Ski Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tate company has disclosed at least one data breach, while New England Ski Museum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Tate company nor New England Ski Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither New England Ski Museum company nor Tate company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New England Ski Museum company.

Tate company employs more people globally than New England Ski Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds HIPAA certification.

Neither New England Ski Museum nor Tate holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References