Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

New England BiolabsNew England Biolabs
VS
Agilent TechnologiesAgilent Technologies
New England Biolabs

New England Biolabs

240 County Road, Ipswich, MA, 01938, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.neb.com
724/1000Moderate

Established in the mid 1970's, New England Biolabs, Inc. (NEB) is the industry leader in the discovery and production of enzymes for molecular biology applications and now offers the largest selection of recombinant and native enzymes for genomic research. NEB continues...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:771
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, 95051, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.agilent.com
802/1000Good

Agilent customers are finding new ways to treat cancer, ensure food, water, air, and medicine quality and safety, discover new drug treatments, research infectious diseases, and create alternative energy solutions for a greener planet. From start to finish, we have them...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:17,508
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
New England Biolabs

New England Biolabs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New England Biolabs in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agilent Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - New England Biolabs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New England Biolabs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Agilent Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agilent Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
New England Biolabs

New England Biolabs

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NEW935121123
Agilent Technologies

Agilent Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between New England Biolabs company and Agilent Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between New England Biolabs and Agilent Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between New England Biolabs and Agilent Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - New England Biolabs or Agilent Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - New England Biolabs or Agilent Technologies ?
Between New England Biolabs and Agilent Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between New England Biolabs and Agilent Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA